Photo listing: general sign/notices (problem)

#190383, nearby

No Entry except Cycles, surely, given how much cycle parking there is here?

#179146, nearby

This is clearly a pedestrian route in to the Maiden Lane development, but why not make it clear whether there's cycle access?

#179097, nearby

Misleading sign - it refers to the road to the left.

#151575, nearby

Pop-up fall-down signage for this Covid-19 closure to motor traffic

#111574, nearby

A dead end for cars, perhaps, but not for cyclists.

#91589, nearby

Typical car-centric signage - it's still a through route, just not for motor vehicles

#74238, nearby

Regents Park - stll anti-cycling.

#54880, nearby

Bikes banned from this (seemingly quiet) London bus lane - why haven't we heard of any protests?

#54868, nearby

No cycle parking on the new Kings Cross Square, and no sign of where any might be - just tube and taxis.

#53062, nearby

Surely this should have an Except Cycles plate?

#53044, nearby

The sign in the background is correct - the dead end sign should have an Except Cyclists plate attached.

#49262, nearby

No entry except cycles needed here.

#37427, nearby

Cycles and taxis are permitted southbound on Pancras Road, but the 'except cycles' panel seems to be missing.

#35528, nearby

No cycling on Primrose Hill - though the route ahead would be an ideal alternative to Prince Albert Road.

#35527, nearby

No cycling on Primrose Hill - though the route ahead would be an ideal alternative to Prince Albert Road.

#35394, nearby

PRIVATE PROPERTY Do not lock bicycles to these railings There are some decent cycle racks a little further down the road.

#27291, nearby

In the Netherlands, Switzerland or Germany (see my photos) the plaza in front of a major station is covered with cycle parking. In the UK we may get a little bit, but only as an afterthought.